How do I read The Economist?

In search of methods to control this information firehose.

1 min
πŸ› soc

I am a subscriber of The Economist and fairly satisfied with the wide coverage. I’ve uninstall all other news applications across all my devices. I like that my coverage is delayed by a few days (at most a week) and never felt that I am missing out on anything. This allows for reporting that is far more researched instead of mindless hyperboles. Opinion pieces are usually well-balanced. The Economist, however, finds itself in a tough spot on hot-button issue like race. Thankfully, the β€œLetters” section welcomes feedback from many readers with opposing views and keeps the discourse healthy.

My main challenge is that there is much quality content but only little time to consume. I characterize this, more dramatically, as an information firehose. This post is an attempt to deliberately make up a preference order for topics that matter to me the most.

EverythingπŸ”—

The Economist categorizes all articles into sections below 1.

Sometimes, there are other special sections.

My PicksπŸ”—

Barring a few interesting pieces in other sections, I’m usually most interested in these.

Reading StrategyπŸ”—

A set of pre-decided favorite sections has not been satisfactory. Not that I want to read everything, I do feel there has to be a better reading strategy to maximize impact.

The search for meta-processes for reading is still on.

FootnotesπŸ”—

  1. I will enumerate in more detail what each section is about at some point. ↩